USPTO serial 76170100
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Greenlane, Auckland, NZ
Greenlane, Auckland, NZ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M Wasnofski Jr
ROBERT M WASNOFSKI JR BAKER AND BOTTS30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 44NEW YORK, NY 10112-4498UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail and wholesale store services and on-line retail store services in relation to apparatus and equipment for recording, transmission or reproduction of sounds or images for use in office, home, car or boat or personal use, audio and video recording devices, equipment and parts and accessories for same, televisions and home theatre systems, photographic equipment, printers, copiers, scanners, radios, radio cassette players, DVD players, MP3 players, wireless devices for mobile computing, recording, printing and communication, and parts and accessories for same, recording discs, tapes and equipment, data processing equipment, calculating machines and calculators, computers, portable and desktop computers, handheld computing devices, personal digital assistants and parts and accessories for same, memory cards, modems, cables, adapters, batteries, portable data drives, telecommunications equipment, products for wireless network connection, carrying cases, computer software, boats, cosmetic and cleaning preparations, perfumery, paints, varnishes and lacquers, jewelry, clothing, footwear and headgear, musical instruments, printed materials, educational and instructional books and texts, artists' materials, office requisites, stationary and writing utensils for all surfaces and materials, furniture; consultation and advisory services in relation to the purchase of on-line goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |