USPTO serial 76170162
S STRIKE MAKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S STRIKE MAKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
80797 Munchen, DE
80797 Munchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. DEAN DOMINGUE
C DEAN DOMINGUE DOMINGUE & WADDELL PLCPOST OFFICE BOX 3405LAFAYETTE, LA 70502UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, SUGAR; NON-ALCOHOLIC COFFEE BEVERAGES, NON-ALCOHOLIC TEA BEVERAGES, COCOA BEVERAGES, CHOCOLATE BEVERAGES, NOT DAIRY OR VEGETABLE BASED, HOT CHOCOLATE, COCOA MIXES FOR HOT COCOA, ICED TEA MIXES, CHOCOLATE SHAKES; CHOCOLATE GOODS, NAMELY, CHOCOLATE COVERED NUTS, CHOCOLATE CHIPS, CHOCOLATE LENSES, NAMES, CONCAVE WAFERS, AND CHOCOLATE BALLS; CHOCOLATE SYRUP, PRALINES, CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES, CHOCOLATE CANDIES, ALSO WITH LIQUID CENTERS; CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY, CANDY, FLAVORED ICES | ACTIVE | Jul 12, 2006 |
| 032 | BEER; ALE; PORTER; MINERAL WATER AND CARBONATED WATER AND OTHER ALCOHOL-FREE SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES, SYRUPS USED IN THE PREPARATIONS OF SOFT DRINKS, NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXES, COFFEE AND COCOA NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXES, FRUIT JUICE CONCENTRATES FOR MAKING BEVERAGES, NAMELY SOFT DRINKS, SOFT DRINKS FLAVORED WITH TEA, FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT PUNCHES, FRUIT-FLAVORED DRINKS, SPORTS DRINKS, ESSENCES FOR USE IN MAKING SOFT DRINKS | ACTIVE | Jul 12, 2006 |
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY BRANDY SPIRITS, DISTILLED SPIRITS, POTABLE SPIRITS; ALCOHOLIC COFFEE-BASED AND COCOA-BASED BEVERAGE MIXES; ALCOHOLIC PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING DRINKS, NAMELY TEQUILA; PREPARED ALCOHOLIC COCKTAILS WITH A MILK-MIXTURE; PREPARED ALCOHOLIC COCKTAILS AND APERITIFS WITH A WINE BASE, PREPARED ALCOHOLIC COCKTAILS AND APERITIFS WITH A DISTILLED ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR BASE; WINES, SPIRITS AND LIQUEURS; WINE-CONTAINING BEVERAGES, NAMELY PREPARED WINE COCKTAILS, WINE COOLERS, WINE PUNCHES | ACTIVE | Jul 12, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S & M Trading GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by S & M Trading GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named S STRIKE MAKER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |