USPTO serial 76170360
CGPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CGPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN J GALLAGHER
M /C 1650-7003 KATHLEEN J. GALLAGHERBOEING MANAGEMENT COMPANY15460 LAGUNA CYN RDIRVINE, CA 92618Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | INDEXING OF ELECTRONIC WORD AND GRAPHICS DOCUMENTS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | ARCHIVING OF ELECTRONIC WORD AND GRAPHICS DOCUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | SCANNING AND PHYSICAL CONVERSION OF ELECTRONIC WORD AND GRAPHICS DOCUMENTS FROM ONE MEDIA TO ANOTHER; AND OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC WORD AND GRAPHICS DOCUMENTS, NAMELY, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESS, QUERY, RETRIEVAL AND DISTRIBUTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PRINTING, REPRINTING AND ENCRYPTION OF ELECTRONIC WORD AND GRAPHICS DOCUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Continental Graphics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Continental Graphics Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CGPRO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |