Drawing for CGPRONET

USPTO serial 76170368

CGPRONET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CGPRONET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nanette M Norton

KATHLEEN J GALLAGHER M/C 110-SB70BOEING MANAGEMENT COMPANY2201 SEAL BEACH BLVDSEAL BEACH, CA 90740-1515

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035INDEXING OF ELECTRONIC WORD AND GRAPHICS DOCUMENTS FOR OTHERSACTIVE—
039ARCHIVING OF ELECTRONIC WORD AND GRAPHICS DOCUMENTSACTIVE—
040SCANNING AND PHYSICAL CONVERSION OF ELECTRONIC WORD AND GRAPHICS DOCUMENTS FROM ONE MEDIA TO ANOTHER; AND OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC WORD AND GRAPHICS DOCUMENTS, NAMELY, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESS, QUERY, RETRIEVAL AND DISTRIBUTIONACTIVE—
042PRINTING, REPRINTING AND ENCRYPTION OF ELECTRONIC WORD AND GRAPHICS DOCUMENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 17, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 17, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance