USPTO serial 76170516
TOOLS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOOLS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Previto
JOSEPH J PREVITO COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power tools namely saws, sanders, impact wrenches, grinders, star drivers, nut drivers, drills, bits for drills, driver bits, knives, grinding wheels, caulking guns, ratchets and ratchet drives, crimping tools, glue guns, screwdrivers, hammers, wire brushes, parts and fittings for all of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 17, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |