Drawing for OPIUM FEN-YUAN

USPTO serial 76170680

OPIUM FEN-YUAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPIUM FEN-YUAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce H. Troxell

BRUCE H TROXELL LEESBURGDOUGHERTY & TROXELL5205 LEESBURG PIKE STE 1404FALLS CHURCH, VA 22041-3894

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Catering, and snack bar servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 11, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 11, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 24, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 5, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 5, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 24, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 23, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 4, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance