Drawing for AURORA

USPTO serial 76170718

AURORA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AURORA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia K. Nicholson

CYNTHIA K NICHOLSON POSZ & BETHARDS PLC11250 ROGER BACON DR STE 10RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OPERATIONAL CONTROL IRRIGATION SYSTEMSABANDONEDOct 1, 1999
011DRIPPER IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, COMPRISED OF VALVES, FILTERS AND REGULATORSABANDONEDOct 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 15, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 15, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 18, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 4, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance