USPTO serial 76170860
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond C. Stewart
RAYMOND C STEWART BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for entering, generating, processing, storing and retrieving biological test data and results, drug screening and drug testing data and results; computer software for entering, generating, processing, storing and retrieving medical and clinical patient and research data and results; computer software for entering, generating, processing, storing and retrieving diagnostic and laboratory data and results; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers and compact disks containing computer software and databases for entering, storing, retrieving, processing and generating biological test data and results, drug screening and drug testing data and results, computer software for entering, storing, retrieving, processing and generating medical, clinical patient and research data and results, and computer software for entering, storing, retrieving, processing and generating diagnostic and laboratory data and results | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical care; biological research; clinical medical research, namely managing treatment of patients undergoing therapy; medical diagnosis of disease; medical services, namely, managing treatment of patients undergoing therapy; therapeutic drug screening and therapeutic drug testing programs; diagnostic laboratory services in the management of disease | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |