USPTO serial 76171050
E-SPACE SOLUTIONS REAL ESTATE FOR CREATIVE AND ENTREPRENEURIAL ENTERPRISES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WISEMAN, MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-SPACE SOLUTIONS REAL ESTATE FOR CREATIVE AND ENTREPRENEURIAL ENTERPRISES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Alison Grabell
J ALISON GRABELL LINER YANKELEVITZ SUNSHINE & REGENSTREIF14TH FL1100 GLENDON AVELOS ANGELES, CA 90024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | REAL ESTATE LEASING SERVICES, NAMELY, LEASING OF OFFICE SPACE AND RENOVATED INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES; REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE SERVICES, NAMELY, BROKERAGE OF OFFICE SPACE AND RENOVATED INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, RENOVATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL WORK SPACES FOR PERSONAL PRODUCTIVITY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by William D. Feldman Associates
- Other trademarks owned by William D. Feldman Associates
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named E-SPACE SOLUTIONS REAL ESTATE FOR CREATIVE AND ENTREPRENEURIAL ENTERPRISES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |