USPTO serial 76171165
REMOTEREAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3520976Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2008
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REMOTEREAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Deerfield Beach, FL
DEERFIELD BEACH, FL
DEERFIELD BEACH, FL
KALAMAZOO, MI
KALAMAZOO, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brewster Taylor
Brewster Taylor Michael Best & Friedrich LLP100 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 3300Milwaukee, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING MEDICAL IMAGES IN THE NATURE OF X-RAY, CAT-SCAN AND MRI IMAGES VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS; AND PROVIDING A WEBSITE ON GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS FEATURING MEDICAL INFORMATION AND MEDICAL IMAGES IN THE NATURE OF X-RAY, CAT-SCAN AND MRI IMAGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ETRAUMA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ETRAUMA.COM CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by ETRAUMA.COM CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REMOTEREAD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 22, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 7, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 16, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |