Drawing for DREAMCOTTON

USPTO serial 76171227

DREAMCOTTON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOLINOFF, JEFFREY S.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DREAMCOTTON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE # 900BRONX, NY 10471-2138UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024cloth labels, bed blankets, bed linen, bed sheets, duvet covers, curtains, table linen, pillow cases, all in finished form for the consumerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 23, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 23, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 23, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 23, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 26, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 4, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 28, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 29, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 29, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 29, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 18, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 4, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance