Drawing for WHERE SCIENCE MEETS SERVICE

USPTO serial 76171294

WHERE SCIENCE MEETS SERVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHERE SCIENCE MEETS SERVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marsha Stolt

MARSHA STOLT DAIN RAUSCHERFISH & RICHARDSON PC PA60 S 6TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4400

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Ophthalmic Lenses for EyeglassesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 30, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 30, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 23, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 24, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 24, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 19, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance