Drawing for CARDINAL

USPTO serial 76171299

CARDINAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARDINAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay H Begler

JAY BEGLER NIXON PEABODY2 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 27SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014watch attachments, namely watch straps and watch braceletsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 25, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 7, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 18, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance