USPTO serial 76171386
SERVERTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SERVERTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY S KORETZ
AMY S KORETZ HOGAN & HARTSON8300 GREENSBORO DR STE 1100MC LEAN, VA 22102-3609UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING INFORMATION REGARDING COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND NETWORKS; ADMINISTRATION AND CONTROL OF REMOTELY ACCESSED COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND NETWORKS; DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS SITES FOR OTHERS; SET-UP, CONFIGURATION, ADMINISTRATION AND MONITORING THE PERFORMANCE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND NETWORKS FOR OTHERS IN ORDER THAT THEY MAY ACCESS, CONTROL AND UTILIZE THE COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND NETWORKS FOR THEIR OWN PURPOSES; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND NETWORKS, NAMELY TECHNICAL TROUBLESHOOTING AND PROBLEM RESOLUTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |