USPTO serial 76171563
ACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-13342 Berlin 13342, DE
D-13342 Berlin 13342, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William F Lawrence
WILLIAM F LAWRENCE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops and the like for physicians and patients in the field of health care; training for physicians and patients in the field of health care | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Research and development of new products for others; medical assistance and medical care | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | NEWR | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS APPROVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |