Drawing for TUNDRA NOODLE CONX

USPTO serial 76171646

TUNDRA NOODLE CONX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUNDRA NOODLE CONX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eugene J.A. Gierczak

EUGENE JA GIERCZAK MILLER THOMSON LLPSTE 2500 20 QUEEN ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 3S1CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028water toys namely, foam flotation toys; connectors for foam flotation toys; units for joining foam rods, polyethylene foam rods and flotation toysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 8, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 5, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance