USPTO serial 76171940
NAVISYS STP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAHAMS, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NAVISYS STP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M Kotran
BETH M KOTRAN GOODWIN PROCTER & HOAR LLPSEVEN BECKER FARM RDROSELAND, NJ 07068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consulting services rendered to the insurance industry in the field of annuities, life insurance, and health insurance; business consulting services rendered to the insurance industry in the field of insurance and financial services for life insurance policy administration, life insurance policy sales illustration, electronic commerce, underwriting, claims adjudication and benefit administration, financial reporting, ceded reinsurance administration, and annuity payout administration; business consulting services in each of the fields stated above rendered to the insurance industry via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | insurance administration in the field of life insurance and annuity products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |