USPTO serial 76171998
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BILLERICA, MA
Other trademarks owned by INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BILLERICA, MA
Other trademarks owned by INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
B.D. of Nevada, Limited Partnership
Reno, NV
Other trademarks owned by B.D. of Nevada, Limited Partnership
B.D. of Nevada, Limited Partnership
Reno, NV
Other trademarks owned by B.D. of Nevada, Limited Partnership
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD E VASSALLO
EDWARD E VASSALLO FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS IN THE FIELD OF SECURITIES, ON-LINE INVESTMENT BROKERAGE, FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION AND PROVIDING FINANCIAL INFORMATION VIA AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |