Drawing for XSEED

USPTO serial 76172223

XSEED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWEENEY, MEGAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XSEED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark G Lappin

MARK G LAPPIN MCDERMOTT WILL EMERY28 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010THERAPEUTIC X-RAY APPARATUS FOR MEDICAL USE, NAMELY AN APPARATUS FOR GENERATING AND DELIVERING X-RAY RADIATION TO A TREATMENT REGION FOR THERAPEUTIC OR PALLIATIVE PURPOSESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance