USPTO serial 76172249
BAREFOOT CONTESSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 2004
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BAREFOOT CONTESSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EAST HAMPTON, NY
EAST HAMPTON, NY
EAST HAMPTON, NY
EAST HAMPTON, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy C. DiConza
Nancy C. DiConza FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 West 42nd St., 17th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ DIPS, NAMELY, VEGETABLE, YOGURT, FISH AND HERB BASED DIPS; HUMMUS, CHILI, STEWS RIBOLLITA, SOUPS, NAMELY, GAZPACHO AND CHOWDERS; SALADS EXCEPT MACARONI, RICE AND PASTA; CRANBERRY SAUCE; APPLE SAUCE, DRIED FRUITS, PROCESSED NUTS, CANDIED NUTS, SNACK MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PROCESSED FRUITS, PROCESSED NUTS AND/OR RAISINS; PROCESSED PEAS WITH WASABI FLAVORING ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ VEGETABLE STRUDEL, VEGETABLE COBBLERS, SPRING ROLLS, ] [ COFFEE, ] [ BREAD CRUMBS, CROUTONS, GRANOLA, CAKES, namely, SOUR CREAM COFFEE CAKE; CANDY, NAMELY, STRAWBERRY FLAVORED LACES; QUESADILLA, SALSA ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | [ FRESH VEGETABLES AND FRESH NUTS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | [ ORANGE JUICE, GRAPEFRUIT JUICE, LEMONADE; NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING [ GOURMET FOODS AND ] BOOKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GARTEN FOOD CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by GARTEN FOOD CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by GARTEN FOOD CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by INA GARTEN LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BAREFOOT CONTESSA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 8, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 8, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |