Drawing for AUTOTECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 76172342

AUTOTECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOTECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Finnan

PATRICK J FINNAN EPSTEIN EDELL SHAPIRO & FINNAN1901 RESEARCH BLVD STE 400ROCKVILLE, MD 20850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009RECORDED OPTICAL AND MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERSACTIVE—
016PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY MOUNTED AND UNMOUNTED PHOTOGRAPHSACTIVE—
038ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF TEXT AND IMAGESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 4, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 4, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 10, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 12, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 9, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 11, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance