USPTO serial 76172717
"STEM CELL LABORATORIES"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with "STEM CELL LABORATORIES"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Babylon, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony V. Raftopol, Esq.
ANTHONY V RAFTOPOL ESQ HERZFELD & RUBIN PC40 WALL STNEW YORK, NY 10005-2301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | -Instruments and inventions derived from research in the field of stem cell use in patient care; software, namely computer software used in biomedical research for the use of stem cells in human organs | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research, namely biomedicaland scientific research, involving the use of embryonic stem cells in production of stem cells for patient care and the differentiation of stem cells for use in human organs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |