USPTO serial 76172864
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jocelyn Dabeau
JOCELYN DABEAU THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 3300DALLAS, TX 75201-4693UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Kitchen tools for use in cooking, baking and serving, namely, chef, kitchen, butcher, steel, paring, boning, carving, utility, pruning and steak knives, hand-operated shears for meat, nonelectric fruit and vegetable peelers, egg and cheese slicers, non-electric hand-operated vegetable and fruit slicers, cleavers, non-electric hand-operated food mincers, manually operated knife sharpeners, non-electric can openers, and flatware, namely knives, spoons and forks; vegetable and fruit pitters | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Kitchen tools for use in cooking, baking and serving, namely bakeware not toys, containers for household and kitchen use not of precious metals, pots, cookware steamers, cake pans, frying pans, metal pans, roasting pans, bread pans, pie pans, saucepans, glass pans, cooking utensils, namely grills, grill covers and wire baskets, household utensils, namely graters, mixing spoons, bottle openers, sieves, spatulas, strainers, brushes for basting meat, turners, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, whisks and skimmers, barbecue utensils, namely forks, thongs and turners, beverage glassware, glass bowls, porcelain plates, ceramic plates, ceramic bowls, ceramic dishes, ceramic food containers, dinnerware, namely plates, bowls, dishes, and food and beverage containers; glass stemware, housewares, namely pitchers, colanders for household use, tumblers and cutting boards, cooking and food serving accessories, namely tea strainers, mixing bowls, cookery molds, cake molds, pastry molds, pudding molds, wine racks, and spice racks, vases; glass, porcelain and ceramic storage jars; salad tongs, cooking tongs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY A CONTINUING COOKING SHOW, TO BE PRESENTED IN PERSON, ON TELEVISION, CABLE, DIGITAL CABLE PROGRAMS AND ON THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |