Drawing for Serial No. 76172952

USPTO serial 76172952

Serial No. 76172952

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3185157Status 790Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 19, 2006
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with Serial No. 76172952?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RONALD S BIENSTOCK

RONALD S BIENSTOCK FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP212 CARNEGIE CENTER, SUITE 400PRINCETON, NJ 08540United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015GuitarsACTIVEDec 31, 1977

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2026NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2026RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 16, 202689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 16, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 31, 2026E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2025TTCDBOARD DECISION COUNTERCLAIM DENIED—
Mar 5, 2024PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 8, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2022WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2022WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 9, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED—
Jun 17, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 17, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 14, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 28, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 1, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 13, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 2, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 18, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 11, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2002LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance