USPTO serial 76173168
KINETECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KINETECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London EC2N 3DA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E Hilton
WILLIAM E HILTON SAMUELS GAUTHIER & STEVENS LLP225 FRANKLIN ST STE 3300BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications apparatus, namely computer hardware, modems, telephones, facsimile machines and video phones for connecting computers to a global computer network for use in trading stocks and bonds and obtaining real-time market data and strategic links to information resources, computers, computer software providing real-time market data and strategic links to information resources for use with electronic trading platforms, IT operations and financial information operations used in connection with the financial field, magnetic, optical and electronic data carriers, pre-recorded CD-ROMs featuring financial data, interactive computer software designed for the collection and distribution of data, financial exchanges, share dealing, stock dealing, and financial transactions, computer firmware, computer hardware, computer installations, computer peripheral devices, namely cables and connectors, disk drives, tape drives, CD-ROM drives, DVD drives, electronic or magnetic cards for memory add-on and memory boards and chips, data storage units, moderns, keyboards, monitors, printers, memory cards, computer mouses, speakers, and parts and fittings for all of the above, all for use in, or relating to, electronic trading platforms, IT operations and financial information operations, for use in the financial field | ACTIVE | Sep 11, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |