USPTO serial 76173391
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
London W1P 6DB, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Clarke Weber
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Diagnostic preparations for laboratory and research use; viral preparations for scientific and research use; diagnostic preparations for scientific and research use, namely, for use in analysis of DNA | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of gene-based diseases; vaccines; diagnostic preparations for clinical and medical laboratory use; namely, for use in analysis of DNA; viral preparations for medical or diagnostic use | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Diagnostic preparations for use in analysis of DNA; medical testing apparatus for use and analysis of DNA | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical and scientific research; discovery and design of pharmaceutical and therapeutic preparations; diagnostic services in the field of gene-based treatment of diseases | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |