Drawing for STYLE XXI TWENTY ONE

USPTO serial 76173660

STYLE XXI TWENTY ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STYLE XXI TWENTY ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003HOUSEMARK FOR A LINE OF COSMETICS, TOILETRIES AND PERSONAL CARE ITEMS; SOAPS, BODY WASHES, BATH OILS, BODY OILS, BODY GELS, SKIN CREAMS, SKIN LOTIONS, SKIN BALMS, BATH CUBES, BATH GELS, BUBBLE BATH, BODY POWDERS, FACE POWDERS, FACIAL CREAMS, BEAUTY MASKS, DEODORANTS, ANTIPERSPIRANTS; SHAVING LATHERS, SHAVING CREAMS, SHAVING GELS, COLOGNES, EAU DE TOILETTE, PERFUMES, AFTER SHAVING LOTIONS, COSMETIC PADS, PRE-MOISTENED COSMETIC WIPES, COTTON BALLS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, COTTON SWABS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, COTTON SWABS FOR PERSONAL USE, NAIL POLISH, NAIL STRENGTHENERS, NAIL POLISH REMOVERS, MOUTHWASH, EYE SHADOW, EYE LINERS, LIP LINERS, LIQUID MAKE UP, MASCARA, BLUSH, SKIN CLEANSING LOTIONS, SKIN CLEANSING CREAMS, SKIN CLEANSING OILS, SKIN MOISTURIZING CREAMS, FACE MOISTURIZING CREAMS, SKIN ANTI-WRINKLE FORMULAE, SKIN TEXTURIZERS, SKIN FIRMING LOTIONS, FOUNDATION LOTION AND SKIN BLEMISH CONCEALER LOTIONS; SKIN BLEMISH COVER STICKS, SKIN BLEMISH COVER CREAMS, SKIN BLEMISH COVER PENCILS, DEPILATORIES, EXFOLIATING CREAMS, EXFOLIATING LOTIONS, EXFOLIATING OILS, FACIAL MASQUES, SKIN LIGHTENERS, SKIN TONERS, LIP GLOSS, LIPSTICK AND POWDER COMPACTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance