USPTO serial 76173665
DURA SHAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURA SHAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Royal Group Technologies Limited
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas S Johnson
DOUGLAS S JOHNSON DENNISON ASSOCIATES133 RICHMOND ST W STE 301TORONTO, ON M5H 2L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | vinyl roof shingles and siding | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |