USPTO serial 76173769
NEXT FASHION SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEXT FASHION SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G Franklin Rothwell
G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3673UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EYEGLASSES, SUNGLASSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | BAGS, NAMELY, HANDBAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, BACK PACKS, SUITCASES; TRUNKS FOR TRAVELING, PURSES AND BILLFOLDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | FABRICS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING AND UPHOLSTERY; TEXTILE LININGS FOR GARMENTS; HOUSEHOLD LINEN; BED COMFORTERS, BED PADS, BED SHEETS, BED BLANKETS; TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPER; TOWELS OF TEXTILE | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | ARTICLES OF CLOTHING FOR MEN AND WOMEN, NAMELY, SUITS, DRESSES, PANTSUITS, BLAZERS, COATS, JACKETS, TUXEDOS, TROUSERS, SLACKS, SHORTS, OVERCOATS, RAINCOATS, MANTLES, PARKAS, ANORAKS, OVERALLS, SHIRTS, TIES, VESTS, SINGLETS, JUMPERS, PULLOVERS, CARDIGANS, SLIPOVERS, BLOUSES, CAMISOLES, SKIRTS, SHAWLS, SCARVES, WAISTCOATS, BATHROBES, BATHING SUITS, BIKINIS, DRESSING GOWNS, PETTICOATS, PAJAMAS, UNDERWEAR, SPORTS JERSEYS, JEANS, SWEATERS, T-SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, GLOVES, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, BELTS; HATS AND CAPS; SHOES, BOOTS AND SLIPPERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Two of Diamonds - Comercio Internacional E Servicos LDA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named NEXT FASHION SYSTEM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |