USPTO serial 76173895
MAGNUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAGNUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
1411 DD Naarden, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATES PCTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562-5615Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Publicity and commercial business; marketing and public relations; business assistance in case of business management and administrative services within the framework of organisational activities; business management and business economics consultancy; registration, transcription, composition, Compiling and systematizing of written and digital communications; compiling and use of mathematical and statistical data; drawing-up of reports with regard to commercial business; bringing up to date of data bases; business services within the framework of exploitation of enterprises occupied with artificial intelligence; rental of office requisites; detachment of personnel; organization of fairs and exhibitions for commercial and advertising purposes; information and consultancy with regard to all the afore-mentioned services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming, development and engineering; computer project management; computer methodological research and computer methodological development; consultancy for selecting computer hardware and software; technical research; compiling technical reports of experts; system analysis; determination of the adequate capacity of data and telecommunication networks; technical project studies; automation services; computer software design; computer software development for electronic data bases; mediation in case of hiring (by order of and chargeable to third parties) and rental of computer hardware and software, as well as rental of access time to computer data bases; design services in the field of artificial intelligence for automation; maintenance and bringing up to date of computer (network) software; provision of access to websites; provision of electronic data bases as well as of computer hardware and software necessary for electronic network services; information and consultancy with regard to all afore-mentioned services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |