USPTO serial 76173968
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph D Kuborn
JOSEPH D KUBORN ANDRUS SCEALES STARKE SAW100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4178UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR PURCHASING GOODS AND SERVICES BY ENABLING A PROSPECTIVE BUYER TO LOG ON TO THE PROGRAM, INDICATE THE GOODS/SERVICES DESIRED TO BE PURCHASED, BE MATCHED WITH, AND CONNECTED TO, SELLERS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, PLACE AN ORDER WITH A SELECTED SELLER, AND RECEIVE CONFIRMATION OF THE ORDER | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | advertising; market prospecting research and analysis; computerized administration of databases; computerized business information services, including online information from a database in the shape of web pages on a global computer network; computerized auditing, data processing, compilation, saving and retrieval of business and trade information, verification of data; computerized file and document management; administration and management of databases; desktop publishing; marketing and direct marketing; negotiation and settlement of commercial transactions for third parties; gathering and providing statistical information; compilation of mailing lists, databases, data, business directories and business information; opinion polls; media research and consultancy; personnel recruitment; updating of information on computer databases; planning, buying and negotiating advertising space; compilation of advertisements for use as web pages on the internet; updating of advertising material and rental of advertising space; compilation and systemization of information into computer databases; business consultancy and consultancy regarding electronic commerce and electronic business; consumer guidance, arranging and consultancy concerning sale of goods and services via a global computer network; consultancy and guidance concerning all the above mentioned services, including such services provided via direct computer lines, via a global computer network or extranet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN, INSTALLATION, UPDATING, MAINTENANCE, AND USER SUPPORT FOR OTHERS FOR COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR PURCHASING GOODS AND SERVICES BY ENABLING A PROSPECTIVE BUYER TO LOG ON TO THE PROGRAM, INDICATE THE GOODS/SERVICES DESIRED TO BE PURCHASED, BE MATCHED WITH, AND CONNECTED TO SELLERS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, PLACE AN ORDER WITH A SELECTED SELLER, AND RECEIVE CONFIRMATION OF THE ORDER | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |