Drawing for IMCUSTOMERCARE

USPTO serial 76174120

IMCUSTOMERCARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMCUSTOMERCARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisabeth A. Evert

ELISABETH A EVERT SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP717 N HARWOOD STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201-6538UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035electronic commerce services via the global computer network, namely providing on-line product catalogs for buyers of input materials, namely, phosphate, potash and animal feed, and providing automated, computerized online ordering services for such goods, including providing those online customers with the ability to track the status of orders, review their ordering history, and create personal, individual customer profiles tailored to their input materials purchasing needsACTIVE—
036Financial services in the phosphate, potash and animal feed industries, namely providing information and access to customers concerning customer accounts, balances and status via a global computer network; financial transaction processing services in the phosphate, potash and animal feed industries, namely processing of checks, credit cards, charge cards, debit cards and on-line debit and credit accounts that enable customers to conduct secure financial transactions via a global computer networkACTIVE—
042computer services, namely, development, building, and operation of a global computer network-based purchasing system in the phosphate, potash and animal feed industriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 24, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance