Drawing for INTELLITEXT READER

USPTO serial 76174284

INTELLITEXT READER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLITEXT READER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID V. RADACK

DAVID V RADACK ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC600 GRANT ST STE 44PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-2703UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE WHICH CONVERTS RAW TEXT INTO A FORMATTED FILE FOR USE IN EVENTUAL DOWNLOADING INTO AN ELECTRONIC DISPLAY DEVICEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 26, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 29, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 9, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 18, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 12, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance