USPTO serial 76174529
SUNCOM I.NOTES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNCOM I.NOTES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Prabha R. Rollins
PRABHA R ROLLINS DOW, LOHNES & ALBERTSON1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE N WSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | wireless telecommunication services, namely transmission of voice and data by electronic means, specifically, two-way text messaging services which allows wireless telephone customers to create, send and receive short text messages on their wireless telephones and create and send short text messages to e-mail addresses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 20, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |