Drawing for THE EXECUTIVE BOARD

USPTO serial 76174644

THE EXECUTIVE BOARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE EXECUTIVE BOARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER F WEINGBERG

PETER F WEINBERG GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1801 CALIFORNIA ST STE 4100DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Books, handbooks and pamphlets relating to businessACTIVE—
035Business consultation; business management and consultation; business research and surveys; market research; personnel management consultation and research; general business best-practices researchACTIVE—
041Arranging and conducting educational conferences; educational demonstrations; developing educational manuals for corporate executives regarding business administration and management; educational research; conducting workshops and seminars in the field of business administration and management; publication of books, handbooks and reports on business administration and managementACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing on-line research reports concerning best-business practices in the field of business administration and managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 9, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 26, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 26, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 3, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance