USPTO serial 76174680
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
6301 ZUG, CH
6301 ZUG, CH
6301 ZUG, CH
6002 Luzern, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND ST 26TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in database management and in global computer networks, namely computer software to assist users in complying with e-commerce legal standards, ethical standards, security and quality management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business consultation in the field of e-commerce; electronic retailing services via computer featuring a wide variety of consumer goods and information of others; Consultation and auditing services concerning compliance with minimum standards of company management; Assessment concerning the quality of e-commerce services rendered | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services in the field of e-commerce, namely, paging services, electronic mail services; telecommunication services, namely local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable and satellite transmissions; web services, namely web messaging and website forwarding services; Internet services, namely streaming of audio and video material on the Internet; and television broadcasting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consultation and auditing services concerning compliance with all of the legal standards for online activity; Consultation and auditing services concerning compliance with information technology security standards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |