Drawing for V-VENT

USPTO serial 76174822

V-VENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with V-VENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES M BAGARAZZI

JAMES M BAGARAZZI DORITY MANNING PAP O BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Land vehicle parts, namely, vents for horse trailers, livestock trailers, commercial vehicles, namely, highway trucks, tractor trailer cabs, panel trucks, delivery trucks, walk-in vans, commercial vans, conversion vans, recreational vehicles, namely, motor homes and pull trailer homes, postal delivery vehicles, namely, conventional panel trucks and right-hand steering wheel panel trucks, and structural parts for boats, namely, vents for sail boats, power boats, and pleasure boatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 24, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 27, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 9, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 18, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance