USPTO serial 76174876
N
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with N?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy S Lapidus
NANCY S LAPIDUS SHAW PITTMAN2300 N ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING STEW OR BOUILLON, PRE-COOKED FROZEN FOODS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, POULTRY, FISH AND/OR VEGETABLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | CURRY, SEASONINGS, SAUCES FOR PASTA AND NOODLES, FLOUR, PROCESSED GRAINS, PRE-COOKED FROZEN FOODS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA, PREPARATIONS FOR INSTANT CAKES OR COOKIES, PREPARATIONS FOR ICE CREAMS, AND PREPARATIONS FOR SHERBETS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NISSHIN SEIFUN GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NISSHIN SEIFUN GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshin Flour Milling Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named N
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |