Drawing for MOBILE TRICENTENNIAL 1702 2002

USPTO serial 76174941

MOBILE TRICENTENNIAL 1702 2002

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOBILE TRICENTENNIAL 1702 2002?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lance J Lieberman

LANCE J LIEBERMAN COHEN PONTANI LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 FIFTH AVE - STE 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176-0091UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014LAPEL PINS, TIE PINS, TIE TACKS, TIE CLIPS, CUFF-LINKS, MONEY CLIPS, AND MEDALLIONS AND MEDALSACTIVE—
016PAPER BANNERS, PAPER FLAGS, STATIONERY, WRITING AND NOTE PADS, BUMPER STICKERS AND BUMPER STRIPS, PAPER BAGS AND PAPER HATS, AND TEMPORARY TATTOOSACTIVE—
021DRINKING AND SHOT GLASSESACTIVE—
024CLOTH BANNERS AND CLOTH FLAGSACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, HATS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS AND VISORSACTIVE—
041ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING A TRICENTENIAL CELEBRATION AND CELEBRATORY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMAACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 10, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 7, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 25, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 12, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance