Drawing for LEARNING CURVE

USPTO serial 76175233

LEARNING CURVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEARNING CURVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Luke W. DeMarte

KENT A LEE ESQ REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN SCSTE 21001000 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Product research and development for others in the fields of entertainment, children's books and magazines, toys, games and educational toys and games, and educational movies and television programsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 30, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 14, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 3, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 24, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance