USPTO serial 76175233
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Luke W. DeMarte
KENT A LEE ESQ REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN SCSTE 21001000 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Product research and development for others in the fields of entertainment, children's books and magazines, toys, games and educational toys and games, and educational movies and television programs | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |