USPTO serial 76175240
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Luke W. DeMarte
KENT A LEE REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN SCSTE 21001000 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | interactive multimedia computer game programs, video recordings featuring music and narration; audio recordings featuring music and narration | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 31, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |