Drawing for LEARNING CURVE

USPTO serial 76175240

LEARNING CURVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEARNING CURVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Luke W. DeMarte

KENT A LEE REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN SCSTE 21001000 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009interactive multimedia computer game programs, video recordings featuring music and narration; audio recordings featuring music and narrationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 24, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 17, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 23, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Oct 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance