Drawing for TUTORBUDDY

USPTO serial 76175253

TUTORBUDDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUTORBUDDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL HERBERT

PAUL HERBERT RICHES MCKENZIE HERBERT LLPSTE 2900 2 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038providing an on-line chat room for transmission of messages among computer users concerning educational subjects relating to all core curriculum subjectsACTIVE—
041Educational research services, educational services, namely. providing courses of instruction at the primary level, providing courses of instruction at the secondary level, providing courses of instruction at the college level; educational services, namely, conducting classes in the field of primary level education, conducting classes in the field of secondary level education, conducting classes in the field of college level education' providing an interactive educational website in all core curriculum subjects; educational tutoring services in the field of all core curriculum subjects; electronic library services; providing instructional educational tutoring services for students in the primary school, intermediate school, middle school, junior high school and high school; providing electronic libraries in all core curriculum subjectsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 23, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 5, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance