USPTO serial 76175282
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori N Boatright
LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized online ordering services in the field of photographs, photographic prints, t-shirts, key rings, coffee mugs, mouse pads, and related souvenir items all featuring personalized photographs and images | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission and streaming of digital images, digital video, digital slide shows and interactive digital presentations over the Internet, local computer networks, wireless networks, and for server-client environments and peer-to-peer environments | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Digital imaging services; electronic imaging, scanning, digitizing, alteration and retouching of visual images such as photographs, artwork, paintings and graphic art, via a global computer network or local networks; online photo composition services; photographic computer imaging; photo fulfillment services, namely, photographic printing and reproduction | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing and deploying graphic arts for use in conjunction with computer networks, web sites and networked appliances, applications and services and for use with wireless appliances, applications and services; computer services in the nature of authoring, capturing, creating, editing, hosting, processing, producing, recording, and on-line viewing of digital images, digital video, digital slide shows and interactive digital presentations; computer services in the nature of authoring, navigating and playing of DVD content via the Internet, local networks and wireless networks; computer services, namely, providing controlled TV and HDTV recording, editing and viewing; providing an on-line computer database of photos, digital images and videos for use by others | ACTIVE | Oct 11, 1983 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |