USPTO serial 76175397
LEGACY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEGACY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
San Jose dos Campos, SP 12225-901, BR
Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell H Stabbe
MITCHELL H STABBE DOW LOHNES & ALBERTSON PCC1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVEN W STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | aircraft engines; engines not for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 4, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |