USPTO serial 76175448
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
92648 Boulogne Cedex, FR
92648 Boulogne Cedex, FR
92648 Boulogne Cedex, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLPLackenbach Siegel BuildingOne Chase RoadScarsdale, NY 10583| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computer services, namely, providing an on-line computer database in the field of purchase requisitions and analysis, purchase order transmission and notification of order delivery; computerized on-line ordering in the field of office supplies, computers, computer peripherals, computer software, office furniture, office equipment, food and beverage vending machines; and computerized on-line ordering in the fields of legal support services, market research studies, recreational and business travel services, related professional consultation services, and catering services | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |