USPTO serial 76175579
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NOVR ZAHMOUL
NOUR ZAHMOUL6009 RICHMOND AVE STE 130HOUSTON, TX 77057-6218UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Blends OF POMACE OLIVE OIL and CANOLA OIL; EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL and CANOLA OIL; EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL and GRAPESEED OIL; EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL and CORN OIL; EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL and VEGETABLE OIL; EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL and SOYA BEAN OIL | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |