USPTO serial 76175597
NAVITRACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NAVITRACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman E. Lehrer
NORMAN E LEHRER1205 KINGS HWY NCHERRY HILL, NJ 08034-1916UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computerized on-line services, namely, providing web access to information relating to supply-chain activity including shipment status and history | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |