USPTO serial 76175620
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Gastronomia Artesanal, S.A. de C.V.
Queretaro, MX
Other trademarks owned by Gastronomia Artesanal, S.A. de C.V.
Gastronomia Artesanal, S.A. de C.V.
Queretaro, MX
Other trademarks owned by Gastronomia Artesanal, S.A. de C.V.
Gastronomia Artesanal, S.A. de C.V.
Queretaro, MX
Other trademarks owned by Gastronomia Artesanal, S.A. de C.V.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith W. Medansky
Keith W. Medansky DLA PIPER LLP (US)PO BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tamales; bread; pastry; coffee; cocoa; sugar; rice; tapioca; sago; artificial coffee; flour preparations made from cereal, namely tamales, cake and pie mixes; ice cream; honey; treacle; yeast; baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces, not including salad dressing; spices; and ice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |