USPTO serial 76175682
CON-WAY MEXICO EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CON-WAY MEXICO EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Information management systems, namely, computer software for shipment processing, preparing shipping documents and invoices, and tracking packages and freight items over computer networks, intranets, and the Internet; wherein the weight of individual packages and freight items are over 200 lbs per package or freight item | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Supply chain logistics, and reverse logistics services, namely, computerized tracking of packages, raw materials, and other freight items for others; warehousing services, namely, kitting, sub-assembly, returns processing, and labeling of documents, packages, raw materials, and other freight items for others; information management services, namely, shipment processing, preparing shipping documents and invoices, tracking packing, and freight items, over computer networks, intranets, and the Internet; business management services, namely managing logistics, reverse logistics, supply chain services, supply chain visibility and synchronization, supply and demand forecasting and product distribution processes for others; and business consulting services relating to product distribution, operations management services, logistics, reverse logistics, supply chain, and production systems and distribution solutions; wherein the weight of individual packages, packing and freight items are over 200 lbs per package, packing or freight item | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Customs brokerage services for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Supply chain, logistics, and reverse logistics services, namely, pick-up, storage, transportation, and delivery of packages, raw materials, and other freight items for others by air, rail, ship or truck; warehousing services, namely, storage, distribution, pick-up, and packing for shipment of packages, raw materials, and others freight items for others; freight forwarding services; and transportation of the goods of others by air, rail, ship, or truck; wherein the weight of individual packages, packing, freight items and goods are over 200 lbs per package, packing, freight item or good | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CON-WAY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CNF Transportation Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CNF Transportation Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named CON-WAY MEXICO EXPRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |