USPTO serial 76175685
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J BELLUS
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | FRAGRANCES NAMELY, EAU DE COLOGNE; EAU DE TOILETTE; EAU DE PARFUME; PERFUME; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; TOILETRIES, NAMELY, BODY LOTION, LIQUID SOAP AND BAR SOAP; BATH SALTS; BATH CRYSTALS; BATH OILS; BATH AND SHOWER GEL; VOILE, NAMELY, A LIGHT BODY OIL, LOTION OR CREAM CONTAINING A SCENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 004 | CANDLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; Key rings made in whole or substantial part of precious metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Paper products, namely, gift wrap paper and bows; paper gift bags; fabric gift bags; diaries; notebooks; agenda books; organizers, namely, personal agendas; desk top accessories, namely, stationery sets consisting of pencils, pens, note pads, and journals; paper place mats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | cosmetic bags sold empty; jewelry rolls; wallets; change purses; tote bag | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Picture frames; non-metal key rings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Textile place mats; bed linen | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | GIFTS AND PREMIUMS, NAMELY, PLUSH TOYS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |